tisdag 19 maj 2020

Learning by doing and reflection


ONL201 is ending, hence this blog post will summarize and reflect upon my experiences, learning and development. “Learning by doing and reflection” is a phrase I usually return to, when thinking about or discussing different aspects of education. This ONL-course has very much lived up to that phrase, and by that advanced my understanding and learning of blended education.

The course has offered several opportunities to know more about and apply different “IT-tools and -approaches”, such as Google drive, Coogle, blog and webinars. In the beginning of the course, I thought that apply and test different tools was the man aim. However, most rewarding have the discussions in the PBL-group (8) been, listening to and argument for different viewpoints with the team members, and the facilitators. Those discussions have made me rethink and reflect, and to learn more about different aspects of blended education.   

Due to the corona pandemic, the learning generated in the course could naturally be put into practice. Realizing the possibilities and advantages of designing online course activities is one major impact from the course into my own practice. For example, how to think and structure webinars with many participants. To communicate before (and after) a webinar, by means of a digital padlet, is an interesting way to involve participants. Another aspects of learning concerning webinars, is that some of the arranged webinars in the course did not live up to my expectations, even if organizer's aim and intentions with the webinars were very. I still learned from them, from a student perspective, i.e. how could it be arranged in another way, to make participants more involved and committed (in the breakout rooms for example)?     

The many opportunities with online education is great, but is not in itself a design mean to all kind of educational activities. I think many of us are more pro the “traditional off-line learning” or more pro “new ways of going online”. A guideline here should be: Always keep the intended learning outcomes in mind and always have the learning in focus (preferably in according to constructive alignment). From that, we will probably come up with a wide variety of blended education.

From the course I have extend my knowledge and apprehension of online education, and sees almost an endless road ahead of possibilities. Together with the “guideline”, I will strive in my teacher role to continuously improve and innovate my educational practice – I.e. doing, reflect, learn and improve.

To summit up: This ONL-course has been very valuable to me in the continuous journey of educational development. Moreover, thanks members and facilitators of group 8, for a pleasant and learning collaboration.

måndag 11 maj 2020

A new way of thinking concerning online education


As a teacher, I like teaching and learning activities (TLA) that becomes somewhat more personal compared with giving a lecture, i.e. meeting students in seminars (smaller groups) or supervising master thesis students. Hence, I have had some resistance to embark online/blended learning. When acquainted with the concept “Flipped class room” I started my journey towards blended learning. I could reduce traditional lectures and instead make recordings, refer to videos, and put more emphasizes on discussions in follow-up seminars.

The “game changer” for education, i.e. the spread of the corona virus, forced me to advance into the field of online learning. I was lucky to join the ONL community and its introductory course. The course guided me to new approaches and tools, supporting online education and learning, and  possibilities to apply and discuss them within an ONL-group (no 8). As a result, or a consequence, I see many more options and possibilities to transform traditional education to online, which I before  could not apprehend. However, online education and learning is not, in my perspective, a solution to all kind of TLAs, but can in many ways improve both learning and efficiency.

From the reflections above, it was also very useful to know about the concept “Community of Inquiry” (Vaughan, Cleveland-Innes & Garrison, 2013) and the more concrete Five-stage model (Salmon, 2013). I especially found the emphasis on socialization when designing a blended/online course interesting. It is relative easy to change a traditional course to become online, for example using recordings, communicate via Zoom, and managing all assignment and study material via a Learning Management System (LMS). But to make students committed and motivated becomes another kind of challenge, than meeting students, or students meeting students, in a campus course.

The concept “Scaffolding for learning” (Salmon, 2014) seems to be important, more than I believed before study the literature and videos in topic 4. I realize now, when designing an online/blended course that I need to go deeper into activities that promotes students and teachers to socialize, as a fundamental prerequisite for commitment and motivation. This is probably the main challenge to obtain a successful online course, i.e. where students (and teachers enjoy) the course and obtain the intended learning outcomes. I am not sure how practicing socialization in an online course, but hopefully further exploration will take me, and my students, there J




References
Salmon, G (2014) Scaffolding for learning. [Homepage] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pKsZ6dVhlI&feature=emb_title

Salmon, G (2013) The Five Stage Model. [Homepage] http://www.gillysalmon.com/five-stage-model.html

Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Edmonton: AU Press. Chapter 1 “The Community of Inquiry Conceptual framework”.